In 2022, the biggest-budget shows on the small screen engage in what’s termed “world building.”
These sci-fi and fantasy programs are escapist entertainment, but only up to a point. It’s hard to avoid drawing parallels between world-building narratives and modern-day issues.
Whether it’s Elves pitted against Dwarves in Middle-earth (Amazon’s “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power,” debuting Sept. 1, rated TV-14), rival houses vying for power in Westeros (HBO’s “Game of Thrones” prequel “House of the Dragon,” premiering Aug. 21, rated TV-MA), or the United Federation of Planets’ racist attitude toward Romulans (Paramount+’s “Star Trek: Picard,” final season due in 2023), these tales often reflect tribalism in the real world.
It’s a recognition that an “us versus them” instinct has beset humankind since, well, forever. Yet these adventures also offer timeless ideals. Archetypal heroes illustrate the leadership qualities that can ameliorate polarization and develop unity and cooperation.
“The mandate when you’re telling stories is to find something where there’s some tension,” says Daniel Abraham, co-author of “The Expanse” novels that were adapted into a recent Amazon series (for ages 16-plus). “The thing that epic fantasy and science fiction lend themselves to on this kind of scale is there’s a largeness to the stories. They’re well built for telling stories about clashes between cultures and nations.”
In “The Expanse,” the solar system is divided into three warring factions: the people of Earth, those who have colonized Mars, and Belters, who mine asteroids in deep space. The miners are an exploited caste, recognizable by their tall and thin physiology because they live in a low-gravity environment. They speak a language called Belter Creole. At its core, “The Expanse” is a critique of racism and tribalism. The difference between the heroes and villains is a narrow versus expansive view of humanity.
“One of those two people says, ‘I want world peace and I’m going to try to build consensus among world leaders that allows us to negotiate our problems,’” says Ty Franck, the other author of “The Expanse” books, which are published under the joint pen name James S.A. Corey. “And the other one says, ‘I’m going to get world peace by killing everybody who doesn’t belong to my tribe.’”
Although “The Expanse” seems to reflect our current milieu, its authors primarily drew inspiration from the pre-classical era in which tyrants ruled city-states. They note that history tends to repeat itself. For that reason, viewers read contemporary politics into fantastical genres.
When “Game of Thrones” – based on a series written by George R.R. Martin – was on air, Ñusta Carranza Ko noticed that her students in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Baltimore regularly referenced the show’s tribal politics in classes. “It reminds me of Thomas Hobbes’ great notion of group egoism,” says Ms. Ko, who co-wrote the book “Game of Thrones and Theories of International Relations” with Laura Young, political science and international studies department chair at Georgia Gwinnett College. “That kind of notion of our group, and our interests versus that of others, gets interfaced multiple times in the ‘Game of Thrones.’”
A common trope in fantastical stories such as “The Expanse” and “Game of Thrones” is that individuals from disparate groups have to learn to see beyond narrow interests based on group identity. They’re compelled to do so by an existential threat that threatens all of them………